India is a country with diversity in people, region, languages, culture, tradition & many more things. There are too many political parties to put forth the voice of common people. But, are these political parties really working for the common man? How would a common man know that the funds given by the government for carrying out the proposed work is utilised or not? & too many questions cannot be answered.
When the election comes, the leader of a political party publishes his promises (Future Activities which he will carry out for well being of people), but more than half of these promises are not fulfilled & the general public forgot the promises made by a politician after some days. So, the current system of electing a representative for municipal, state & national elections should be slightly modified.
A Review System should be built up as like the appraisal system carried out in professional organisation. Whenever in the election, a leader comes up with promises, he should mention the tentative duration by which these promises will get fulfilled. This review committee should consists of a lawyer, political leader of opposite party(not compulsory), accountant, a social worker & committee should have a proper record keeping system. Also, each group/subgroup should have at least one young member (age: 18-30). The number of persons in a committee will also be dependent on the work area of elected representative. These review committees should be categorised into 3 groups.
Each Subgroup in the First group, (the review committee for inspecting Corporators) will look after 20 Elected Corporators. Each subgroup under the Second Group of Committee will look after 5 MLA’s. Each Subgroup under third Review committee Group will look after 5 MP’s. Depending on the number of Corporators/MLA's/MP's, subgroups should be formed where the structure of member committee will be the same as proposed above. The review committee members will be elected by the leader of opposite party. The leader from opposite party will get selected based on his educational qualification (e.g. for a Corporator review committee, from all leaders those who have contested for elections only one person will be selected who will belong to the party which does not have the majority in that 20 region, preferably based on their highest educational qualification). The administration expenses of review committee will be funded by donation given by public/corporates. The review system should be carried out twice in a period of five years (Since generally candidate is selected as Corporator, MLA or MP for 5 Years), particularly after 2 years of duration.
The elected representative who found guilty of not achieving 60 % of their promises will be debarred from contesting election for next two terms i.e for 10 years.
When the election comes, the leader of a political party publishes his promises (Future Activities which he will carry out for well being of people), but more than half of these promises are not fulfilled & the general public forgot the promises made by a politician after some days. So, the current system of electing a representative for municipal, state & national elections should be slightly modified.
A Review System should be built up as like the appraisal system carried out in professional organisation. Whenever in the election, a leader comes up with promises, he should mention the tentative duration by which these promises will get fulfilled. This review committee should consists of a lawyer, political leader of opposite party(not compulsory), accountant, a social worker & committee should have a proper record keeping system. Also, each group/subgroup should have at least one young member (age: 18-30). The number of persons in a committee will also be dependent on the work area of elected representative. These review committees should be categorised into 3 groups.
Each Subgroup in the First group, (the review committee for inspecting Corporators) will look after 20 Elected Corporators. Each subgroup under the Second Group of Committee will look after 5 MLA’s. Each Subgroup under third Review committee Group will look after 5 MP’s. Depending on the number of Corporators/MLA's/MP's, subgroups should be formed where the structure of member committee will be the same as proposed above. The review committee members will be elected by the leader of opposite party. The leader from opposite party will get selected based on his educational qualification (e.g. for a Corporator review committee, from all leaders those who have contested for elections only one person will be selected who will belong to the party which does not have the majority in that 20 region, preferably based on their highest educational qualification). The administration expenses of review committee will be funded by donation given by public/corporates. The review system should be carried out twice in a period of five years (Since generally candidate is selected as Corporator, MLA or MP for 5 Years), particularly after 2 years of duration.
The elected representative who found guilty of not achieving 60 % of their promises will be debarred from contesting election for next two terms i.e for 10 years.
hey man, but politicians are most corrupted people, & they would corrupt the whole system which u described. Better thr will be some foreign agency who will do monitoring of all these politician. But its really good successions.
ReplyDeletethe review system is hypothetical can't be practical unless the candidate at grass roots were not selected democratically (without financial, ancestor influence) this may keep tab on the system, and government is working in this direction. but their is need to implement this in every party which takes participation in election.
ReplyDelete